This community is committed to centering the perspectives and voices of the Global South. As such, all posts and comments must demonstrate respect for this fundamental principle.

This is not a platform for imperialist or colonialist mindsets. Users seeking a forum for such views will find ample accommodation across Silicon Valley platforms and numerous other Fediverse instances. That is not the purpose of this space.

Here, we consciously prioritize the voices of the global majority—those routinely oppressed and silenced elsewhere. Our moderation and enforcement policies exist explicitly to uphold this mission. If you are accustomed to norms prevalent on mainstream Western platforms, please understand that you are now participating in a community where those norms do not apply.

Before posting or commenting, especially if you reside in a first world Western nation, we urge you to:

  1. Inform yourself on the issues at hand.
  2. Consider how your words might be received by those from the regions you discuss.
  3. If unsure, choose to listen rather than speak.

This reminder is prompted by recent global political events. Should you face moderation, the reason will be visible in the modlog. Contact the moderators only if you genuinely believe an error was made. Otherwise, please understand that an action likely felt permissible to you—based on your experience elsewhere on the internet—may contradict the core values of this community.

  • ghost_laptop@lemmy.mlOPM
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 days ago

    how do you think moderation happens if it is not “based on moderator discretion”? There is no rule that fits all scenarios, you always need a human to decide that…

    • Gaf@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 hours ago

      I’m not arguing against moderator discretion, I’m saying this community would benefit from stating the discretion boundary explicitly.

      You’re already doing it in practice (“deemed offensive,” “promotes right-wing ideologies”), and that’s your right. But between what’s been stated in this post and the current written rules, it’s easy for users to assume a level of consistency and auditability that the tooling doesn’t really provide.

      Maybe something like this would help:

      Rule 3: Respect the community’s principles.

      Posts/comments may be removed if they conflict with our mission to center Global South perspectives. This includes (but isn’t limited to) discriminatory language, colonial/imperialist framing, or right-wing ideology.

      Removed content may not be shown in the modlog. Removal reasons may be brief.

      That would make expectations crystal clear and avoid confusion.

      • ghost_laptop@lemmy.mlOPM
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 hours ago

        I think some of those are superseded by the instance’s rules, so communities generally avoid stating the same rules twice. E.g.: the instance’s rules and the community’s rules. I’ll message and admin and ask their opinion, though.