• Remember_the_tooth@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    3 days ago

    ChatGPT:

    The passage you’ve provided appears to be a modern, humorous piece written in a biblical or archaic style, likely intended as a parody or creative expression. It doesn’t match any widely recognized literary works or classic texts. The style is reminiscent of satirical writings that mimic the language of religious scriptures to describe everyday situations—in this case, the relatable experience of a cat demanding food at night.

    While the exact source isn’t identified in the available information, it’s possible that this piece originated from an online forum, blog, or social media post where users share creative writings. If you have any additional context or information about where you encountered this passage, I might be able to assist further in pinpointing its origin.

    • VicksVaporBBQrub@sh.itjust.worksM
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      I would additionally assume ChatGPT would not have access to other LLM databases (for searching). Especially smaller and beta LLM’s. For example if someone out there is creating\testing a MedievalGPT app, and posting online its own outputs.

        • VicksVaporBBQrub@sh.itjust.worksM
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          Current A.I. is all over the place. It’s hard which ones to recommend as they evolve and names change. Google(Gemini\Bard) and Microsoft (Copilot) are quite large – server farm-wise. OpenAI is made in many apps. DeepSeek is in the news lately. There was once a philosophy bot I liked that actually remembered my answer\correction a year and a half later. Do any of these share search results with each other? No clue.

          Modern solution… treat it like a search engine… best to use more than one, just make sure.