• anomnom@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 day ago

    NT/2000 always gets left out of these, I ran 2000 on an old PC for years past XP and Vista even. But all it was doing was running a vinyl and laser cutter.

      • skisnow@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 day ago

        ME would just be a brick wall.

        And I would happily go back to using 2000 if I could. I held out all the way up to about 2012, at which point the number of games that wouldn’t run out of the box got to an untenable amount. :(

        • anomnom@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          11 hours ago

          Yeah ME wasn’t worth looking at, we downgraded my GF’s computer after it wouldn’t run well. 95 was a big jump over 3.1, but still more like a beta for 98.

          But I switched to 2000 not long after it came out. I did set up my first home built PC with 98, in 98, just got a sudden flashback to the defragging screen. Shudders.