But WHERE’S THE PROFIT INCENTIVE.
- Capitalists, when their wives ask them to have sex with them.
But WHERE’S THE PROFIT INCENTIVE.
Who is this supposed to be? Charlie Kirk’s wife? If so that’s hilarious in a this-timeline-is-a-disgusting-joke kind of way.
Just watched Grapes of Wrath and that’s basically the vibe of the movie.
As much as I don’t like a lot of things done by America (or most countries for that matter), this is kind of cringe?
… Ah, ok. Then jobs must pay that and then some, right?
Right?


Reading your source, it sure sounds like genocide.
That said, it seems like a summary rather than a detailed report and I can’t find the source in the page.
The other people responding to you are saying “did you read the statement by the perpetrators of the genocide denying it?” Sounds like a rather silly statement.
Can’t really weigh in on this but on the face of it it does feel like tankie behaviour.
EDIT: I’ve now skimmed the UN Human Rights report and it’s definitely genocide. The only possible claim against this is that all of their information is false, which seems unlikely.
I’ll also add that the first response above linking to the UN source I’ve seen copy pasted elsewhere. That doesn’t necessarily mean much but, yeah.
I may not like many of what I know of China’s policies (genocide, suppression of free speech etc.), but this is one of the things they have done well.
I remember a story a while back about an energy company suing to get a church to take down their solar panels because they were selling their power cheap to residents.
Sadly energy company won.
Wow. I thought only the right had conspiracy theorists.
Context for people who don’t get the joke, the logo on the right is for Tailwind, a library that offers an alternative to using normal CSS for styling Web UIs and websites.
It provides you with microclasses that add flexbox, margins, shadows etc. and discourages you from using the “Cascading” part of CSS (which was likely a mistake imo)
Ultimately, it’s still CSS under the hood which is the joke.
Splitting hairs. If you think a group of people are intrinsically worse than others, you are effectively racist.
We can come up with new names, but ultimately it’s all the same. If you think racism means black vs white then your understanding is kindergarten level.
If you prefer, we can use the term bigoted. That term also covers other intrinsic groups like trans, gay and disabled people among others.