Your edit adds the missing part, this is indeed a twist based off of a joke the reader is expected to already know.

Whoosh.

There are (at least) two layers of joke here. One is indeed referential of the self importance that is prevalent in professional settings, and that LinkedIn users are especially known for, where the joke pokes fun at this stereotype.

The other layer is that this is a meta joke, actually showing that they understand the premise of the question, but apply the lateral thinking to the situation (rather than question) and at the same time question the practice of lateral thinking interview questions that are trendy, but typically pointless for any hiring decision.

Cus you’re busy dealing with whatever caused the tantrum?

deleted by creator

I’m trying to read your argument generously, and it comes off as: a minority has to work with the enemy to have a chance at achieving some of its goals.

Please correct me, as that doesn’t seem right?

The GOPedo with Trump are still in the popular minority of votes, they haven’t been neither popular majority nor willing to compromise for 50 years.

White Christians aren’t a US minority group, or do you mean that the GOPedo has negotiated with them for the current policies? (With minorities I refer to political minority powers, not necessarily demographics)

Or is it the plurality of voters that should accept working with Trump over Biden to get some of their policy? It would seem that Biden would be the compromise candidate, as Trump doesn’t seem to be pursuing any voter driven policy (health care, jobs, lower inflation, lower cost of living, legalising drugs, etc.), besides perhaps those of further US minorities (Heritage foundation, oligarchs, Saudi Arabia, Russia).

Would you please clarify what you’re arguing for with your picked examples?

Good thing he got replaced, the next one would never do that right?

Oh, he did as well? Well, at least you voted him out when you found out.

Wait, you elected him back? Despite him having done so before just last time, and openly promising to do so again? And the alternative not having done so, nor promising to?

How much could you really care if you’re repeatedly and knowingly going against it?