I love how ‘people I disagree with’ becomes ‘people without principles’

While a lot of libertarians end up being conservatives that want to be cool, I’ve met quite a few who believe strongly in the fundamental principles.

I disagree with them precisely because they are principled. I don’t feel the need to deny them their capabilities of believing something.

Is this just you being unable to imagine people who legitimately disagree with you?

Anarchists are to liberalism as libertarians are to Republicans.

Every so often you’ll run into one that is serious and intellectually rigorous to the ideals they profess, but most of them are simply (liberals/republicans) but also want to be cool.

Hitler.

Stalin, for what he was, wasn’t fascist.

You need to read more.

Okay CIA.

You want failure and don’t want communism or socialism in other words.

You know what the single most powerful force in human history is?

Organization. Which is always hierarchal. It doesn’t have to mean socially, but definitely organizationally.

If anarchism didn’t exist, the CIA would have had to create it.

You know what the most common attribute of Anarchist revolutions is? They all failed. Every single one of them. That is what you want. Failure.

That is one of the more honest examples of what they do.

You want dishonest?

They count the difference between expected birthrate and actual birthrate.

War causes people to have less babies? Each baby not born = 1 death caused by communism.

Worse then dead, they never were.