MotoAsh

Isn’t there some evidence that Mars also had rings? Or at least there is an unanswered question as to whether its moons came from rings or are headed to rings. Is that not in the same confidence domain we think Earth had rings?

Is it nice to make someone do the mental labor of coming up with a gift?

water beds… ouch, bad choice for a fucked up back.

That’s not unusual, depending on a few factors. What really matters is how disruptive it is. I do the same, but as long as it’s just a rollover, I can be back to dream land in a minute or two. … unless it was shitty dreams, then I might be missing the rest of my sleep…

Thus making you your own problem.

You didn’t say much at all, just insults. It is very much you failing to communicate anything except contempt, so ofc I have to assume.

You are the problem you complain about, dumbass,

So… you’re too stupid to understand how knowledge works? You’re too dense to understand the concept of the “known unknown” vs the “unknown unknown”?

You ignorant morons are insufferable to me.

You would hope, but far too many people fail to even understand the shape of the hole in their knowledge, so they wouldn’t even recognize what should go in that blank spot…

Then you get billions of people believing there’s a magical sky daddy that will take care of us no matter what, and those words about us being good stewards of the earth is totally just about like, not pooping on the road! Definitely not about wanton resource extraction and environmental exploitation and distruction…

All those lessons about how to be a good ruler are just describing that sky daddy! They’re definitely not direct and allegorical stories trying to teach what virtues to look for in leaders and which ones deserve to be dethroned… God is definitely real literally and not just allegory for leaders that are glorified, it’s definitely not about humans treating other humans with respect, but about Sky Daddy playing with his toys!

Does it if you know, though…?

IMO, even involving location and private data in the digital ecosystem that includes a centralized LLM is a very unwise thing to do.

We both know that LLMs can and will spit out ANYTHING in their training data regrdless of how many roadblocks are put up and protective instructions given.

While they’re not necessarily feeding outright personal info (of the general public, anyways) in to their LLMs’ models, we should also both know how slovenly greedy these cunt corpos are. It’ll only be a matter of time before they’re feeding everything they clearly already have in.

At that point, it won’t just be creep factor, but a legitimate doxxing problem.

The result in the end should be an organized series of events, a process, that takes or produces data. The data can be anything from a single number in a calculator, to a text message, to your entire social profile. The process can be anything from basic math, to advanced math (i.e. machine learning, rendering, cryptography, etc), to performing simple operations on that data like shuffling that data somewhere else.

These processes are stacked on top of each other and utilized with basic logic (if, else, loops, scope, etc) and combined together with a myriad of programming patterns and algorithms, to produce higher and higher orders of complexity, that eventually solve a real-world problem.

The result is an ever increasing complexity of useful tools and processes that can either solve specific problems directly or at least provide discovery for other useful tools and processes that might.

It’s translating higher order problems from something understandable at the task level all the way down until a piece of specialized rock that only understands on and off can eventually spit out a meaningful result.

ok ok electrical engineers get the claim for the last sentence, and plenty of the real-world complexity, but hopefully it illustrates my point that ‘nothing’ is … just wrong. We cannot discount the absolute importance of abstract things. Everything from “imaginary” numbers to completely abstract things like philosophy have real- world consequences. If programming produces nothing, then MOST jobs that aren’t manual labor produce nothing.

I don’t think you understand how inept government or law enforcement is… demonstrably… with centuries of evidence…

Insurance fraud and corruption ARE the simplest explanation for a lot of these kinds of “accidents”.

Which is more likely? Many people failing to do their jobs, or a small corrupt few going, “whoopsie!”?

lol such a child. You probably get bullied with that hilariously shitty of an attitude. Pathetic.

lol Me telling you why you’re being made fun of outside of your shitty attitude isn’t snark. Just further proving that lack of reading comprehension…

Like I said. Reading comprehension. Lacking.

Snark just makes you sound 12.

Read the comic again. One day you’ll understand that you’re defending the butt of the joke. You’re the, “leave Britney alone” person of this post.

Even if you were correct (and you’re not), you’d still be wrong.

Your reading comprehension is severely lacking.

They’re commenting about how the name is bad and how that X is ruined in the public zeitgeist. Yes, X the display framework has been around for decades, but Random Joe 28507 still doesn’t know what that X is.