Nah, those days are over. Swiss bank accounts are now just as open as any other countries. Switzerland is just a US dog.

Point being that Switzerland actually does not give a shit about such things. Famously it kept most of the gold the nazis stashed there.

A peaceful conclusion is certainly preferable.

only for all the liberals to then cry and blame Trump for setting a bad precedence.

Liberals are unable to do this. The creation of Kosov and the preceeding illegal bombing campaign on Jugoslawia set the precedent for Russias actions in Ukraine. Libs are mighty silent about this fact.

The US already did a massive genocide - 99%+ of the native population.

It also worked another population to death for decades - Chattel slavery

Another genocide was commited on the Philipines after ignoring their declaration of independence and invading - a third of the population was killed.

But you’re right, as long as its not white people who are suffering first worlders don’t care.

That one was honestly hilarious. Kashoggi was a total swamp monster, but he ended up with the wrong faction in the power struggle in Sa so he got butchered. Karma.

The blocking of certain candidates happend for good reason: Those were involves in assassination plots against the government and coup plots. Any other country would have jailed them or outright put them to the wall.

I mean, its historically described Soviet policy in Eastern Europe and Chinese domestic policing (Khrushchev putting down the Hungarian fascist revolt with armored infantry and Deng sending tanks into Tienanmen Square).

Only the first one.

The situation is quite different, China has every right to do so. Because every country has the right to conclude its civil war. Such a civil war is still ongoing between the PRC (Peoples Republic of China - “China”) and RoC(Republic of China - “Taiwan”), both claim to be the legitimate government of the entity China. The reason the PLA did not finish the job in the 40s was US intervention and the start of the korean war.

This is a completely internal matter for China according to international law.

A revival of utopian socialism. Just as futile, but treatlerites refuse to learn.

Evidence for that? Ukraine government - the same who sold the Ghost of Kiev, Russia collecting Ukrainian children like Pokemon, the Martyrs of Snake Island, the secessionists shelling themselves, Russia shelling itself, russian troops shelling themselves, russian timetravel technology deployed in Bucha and much more.

Is getting your intelligence insulted your kink or something?

Do you always believe everything your enemies tell you? Are you allergic to critical thinking?

The Russian RSFR, the Paris Commune, The Bavarian soviet Republic, The Rhine Soviet Republic, The Hungarian Socialist Republic, socialist Cuba, socialist Vietnam, socialist Laos…

Turns out you don’t knwo what you’re talking about! All of them were immediately invaded, their opposition showered in material support and sanctioned to hell and back.

Turns out supporting genocide makes you look bad. Someone should’ve told Biden and Copmallah.

It’s almost as if your party doupoly consists of two fascist parties.

Certain anarchist factions were nothing more than bandits, its honestly weird to see someone defend those clowns.

Plenty of anarchists joined the Bolsheviks, somehow those are never mentioned.

The CPC has over nine million members

95 million members actually, and around 110 mllion in its youth wing. So about one in seven chinese.

Notice the flags? This is not about imperial China, it is about the PRC.

Or are you one of the weirdos who also thinks Russian Empire = USSR = Russian Federation?

Overall it was a shitshow. Vietnam also ethnically cleansed its chinese minority and there was fighting at t he border because it was pretty much indefined. Furthermore, Vietnam ahd close ties to the USSR, with which China had recently broken. Thus China saw itself between the allied stated of Vietnam and USSR.

Fittingly the resulting border war also was a total shitshow. A few PLA divisions pushing into Vietnam, without artillery or air support. Vietnam defended with local militias as its army was in Cambodia. China occupied some border cities, but took severe losses, then it went home. The vietnamese militias were excellent fighters but lacked heavy arms, so all they could do is delay the chinese (which they did admirably). Both sides claimed victory and the relations between the two countries were in the gutter until a few years ago.

You first point is such a vapid one. China is a multi cultural state, lots of different cultures and languages. The governemnt of the region back then clearly did not consider it important enough, because they were fine with joining China.

The claims in the South China Sea overlap. Some islands are claimed by Brunai, Malasia and the Philipines, others are claimed by the PRC and the Philipines.

The military bases are less because of claims but because the US is sending its warships through this area all the time in a “nice trade routes you have here, would be sad if someone did something about them…”-move.

Tibet was a part of China, it was essentially a warlord territory. With the warlord being the Dalai Lhama. It did not consider itself “other nation”, which is obvious from the fact that its regime did agree to join the PRC. Both sides came to an accord regarding the conditions, most importantly Tibet had to abolish slavery within a agreed uppon timeframe. The Lhama regime did not do so, thus peaceful unification was off the table and the PLA did the unifying.

1. Ukraine provoked said war for 8 years. Fully believing (or being led to believe) it would win.
2. it did ethnic cleansing in Donbas during that time and was preparing to finish the job when Russia brought the Hammer down
3. In a war the losing side has to make concessions to reach peace, not the winning side. Russia is winning that war, ergo Ukraine has to make concessions. In WW2 Japan surrendered unconditionally, it was not the Allies who made any concessions to Japan. When Prussia invaded Denmark, Denmark conceded Holstein to Prussia. Prussia did not concede anything to Denmark, it won that war. Did you per chance believe that Mexico turned over half of its territory to the USA because it was in a good mode or something? The US defeated Mexico in a war, Mexico had to make huge territorial concessions. It is completely irrelevant who was the agressor in this regard. In other words: Why should I concede you something when I am in a position to take more? You have to concede something to prevent me from taking more.

5 generations of not knowing how peace making works. Something any grand strategy video game would’ve teached you. Or looking up any war in history. Loser makes concessions, how hard is this to get?