One thing I’ve just noticed: why is Tux holding his foot?

I have no technological problem with Rust. I have a problem with the people behind it. Soydevs recoding GPL projects and relicensing them as pushover licenses for their corpo-thugs they desperately wish were their friends.

The new Call of Duty games do some SCP level containment for everyone sane in this hobby. Let Windows have that!

Small correction: since the newest version there only is Trunas Scale, so the Debian derivative, which they now call Community Edition. The BSD variant has been decommissioned as far as I know.

He’s a magician, because reading this, I aged 10 years and grew a metastatic tumor.

Usual suspect, the Wi-Fi/Bluetooth card. Milk spoils? Wi-Fi/Bluetooth Card! Freshly divorced? Wi-Fi/Bluetooth card!

Wget?

“I can’t switch, there’s this one function of this one programme that I may need in the next 50 years.”

Oh no! It only plays the CoD games that were good.

IMO: let windows have that, as these games do some SCP-level containment for everyone sane in this hobby.

What? New software doesn’t have the same level of battle testing that 30 year old software, with billions of deployments had? What does that matter? It’s memory safe, guys! That means it can’t have any bugs!

Started with PopOS and stayed ever since.

Notepad++

I have a fundamental problem with this attitude. If you recognize there’s a problem, and the problem disturbs you, and you CAN fix it, why not fix it? It’s not world hunger, it’s a computer for God’s sakes. Maybe I don’t want to hear people complain about problems that are 100% within their control and refuse to fix it.

Not about GNU/Linux. Just my thoughts on complaining about simple problems with easy solutions.

Edit: typo

Please enjoy this copy pasta from another comment I made:

My brother in Christ, the joke is life wouldn’t work without this “junk” DNA. And if Arch users were to get rid of this “bloat”, they would literally dissolve.

My brother in Christ, the joke is life wouldn’t work without this “junk” DNA. And if Arch users were to get rid of this “bloat”, they would literally dissolve.

What’s the story behind /etc/ as /etsy/?

Hot take

If the world was running on GNU/Linux for endpoints, tech-normies would still be using computers from 2010. And this would cut massively into laptop OEM’s bottom line. Therefore I think it’s a quiet conspiracy where laptop manufacturers or the computer OEMs shut up about Windows being bad because just imagine if everyone would be running GNU/Linux. You could use laptops from 2010 with “regular” distros and be completely fine. With light distros you could use things from the 1990’s for all tech normie tasks, web-browsing, text editing, e-mail, etc.

TLDR: Microshit Windows bad.

Sure, you can even have the biggest piece.

The 16TB I have free, are for emotional support.

IMO the rat faced cunt Farage destroyed Britain for good. Now he’s kicking it while it’s down.