- 0 Posts
- 12 Comments
1·2 months agoThat’s not the question you asked.
Windows 1.0 launched in 1985. Which was 40 years ago.
21·3 months agoSo, look at it this way. A 50% increase on just the SOC (not any of the other components) would be equivalent to something like an extra $20 on a $200 memory module.
So the average consumer will still buy it and pay $20 extra. But Open AI and the like are buying thousands. That $20 adds up. It adds up real fast. And that’s what companies like SanDisk are counting on.
The article does a poor job of explaining in real world money how much extra these components will cost and that’s part of the reason people are freaking out.
They’re a corporation. Are you telling me you wouldn’t try to bilk these AI companies if you could? If you could charge exorbitant prices to Open AI or similar? That you wouldn’t bill Google at 500% the market rate if you could?
This is what these companies do to everyone else. Why wouldn’t they do it to each other?
Probably because your pattern recognition is well honed.
Mostly because I don’t like gaming on windows and I want things to work without having to tweak every single security feature and all the junk I turned off every single time there’s an update. I’m also tired of MS breaking things with updates and generally using the public as free beta testers to the detriment of their products.
Also, fuck 365.
Yep. That’s a web ring.
It’s already got ai summaries of the news articles that show up there for me and I’m about to disable it just because of that.
Also, I don’t want the trending BS.
Thank you. That’s what I wanted to know.
Would implementing something like this prevent this problem?
Ah. There’s the backtracking I was expecting. They keep doing this. Making a feature opt-out instead of opt-in and then backpedalling as soon as the users revolt, offering a “happy medium” to placate us so they can continue to do the same shit over and over again.
Google does this with chrome too.