Love Debian as server. It’s decent on desktop, but its documentation isn’t exactly geared towards that, and aside from that, I wouldn’t recommend it to a newbie.
but there are a lot of good Debian based distros out there, for desktop and other - and for good reason.
Love Debian as server. It’s decent on desktop, but its documentation isn’t exactly geared towards that, and aside from that, I wouldn’t recommend it to a newbie.
but there are a lot of good Debian based distros out there, for desktop and other - and for good reason.
They did argue that beauty lies in the eye of the beholder - so successfully, that you wrote paragraphs to attempt to fight their causal words, and ended up bringing that statement up yourself.
The only thing better is to be a giant, unkillable sex wizard and not be remembered.
doubt Surely OP’s post was purely informational…
You don’t sound annoyed. You’re failing OP.
It serves a fervent purpose and does it well, even if it’s not something I *prefer.
I do have some usage interaction, so ease of script writing is the most important for me.
I’ve heard of runit… …one of the inits impressed me recently in regard to script writing - maybe what’s used on OpenWRT. But, I don’t remember if that was runit. You can tell how vested i am here. XD
I can’t believe you’re dissing systemd indirectly by dissing the reaction of systemd users to the reaction of the users that hate systemd.
To any neutral observers out there: See!?!! This is the kind of crap we get from the haters.
/s of course, I have no skin in this game. Any time I mess with init systems, I have to look up usage, no matter the system involved, and I haven’t run into anything too onerous.
No problem. It’s fake. No need to look deeper.
I was just about to say that I’d be raising an error, not returning a string.
I see you understand the code well.
fair. there’s a lot of only kinda gun fun stuff after that side from the good stuff. i gave up at math.
but where is the couple kissing?
snaps! hiss
Yes, ish. There are aspects of it that are really valuable, and fit some use cases extremely well. But, in some senses, yes. Like any DBMS, you’ve got to know it’s strengths and weaknesses. And if you do, there are definitely circumstances where you’d choose it over others. But not always.
This is kinda absolute BS at this point, though.
Mongo has acid transactions, and has for years now. Although this is only within the same database, there are plenty of dbms (including rdbms) that don’t support cross-database transactions.
Mongo also, since time immemorial, has had “write concern” to ensure that it’s written to disk (to the journal) before the transaction is completed.
Hehe. The world is what you make of it, fellow human.