- 1 Post
- 13 Comments
Yes but I think the commenter is saying that if a person had installed this package, removing the package in the package manager is probably insufficient to remove the infection from the machine.
drspod@lemmy.mlto
RISC-V@lemmy.ml•Milk-V Titan (RISC-V MINI-ITX, powered by UltraRISC UR-DP1000)
5·7 months agoCompliant with RVA23* (excluding “V” extension)
Does this mean that it will or won’t be compatible with Ubuntu 25.10 (that is targetting RVA23)?
drspod@lemmy.mlto
Tech@programming.dev•'It's obvious that users are frustrated': consumer rights group accuses Microsoft of not providing a 'viable solution' for Windows 10 users who can't upgrade to Windows 11
172·7 months agoI’d just like to interject for a moment. What you’re referring to as Linus Torvalds, is in fact, GNU/Linus Torvalds, or as I’ve recently taken to calling it, GNU plus Linus Torvalds.
drspod@lemmy.mlto
Linux@programming.dev•Fedora X11Libre change proposal withdrawn after 'overwhelmingly negative feedback'
31·8 months agoI do not want to waste everyone’s time by continuing this discussion that is not leading anywhere.
Not leading anywhere? That’s a strange perspective to have given the “overwhelmingly negative feedback.” I think it led to a fairly concrete conclusion.
I think what he meant to say was “I don’t like that my arguments did not sway your opinion.”
It’s the effect of a persistent decades-long disinformation campaign perpetrated by those who wish to destabilize western democracies which has been signal-boosted by naive (or maliciously designed) recommendation algorithms on social media platforms.
There is nothing to be “weary” of
I checked, and OP actually spelt “wary” correctly.
drspod@lemmy.mlto
Linux@programming.dev•Why Microsoft open sourced PowerShell and ported it to Linux
161·8 months agobash scripting is not intended to perform all of your logic in the scripting language, it’s intended to call out to other programs which perform specific tasks. The entire POSIX command set is your bash scripting language.
Your script is a simple one-liner if you know some simple commands:
$ head -n 1 /usr/share/dict/words | tee /dev/stderr | tr -d '\n' | wc -c A 1
drspod@lemmy.mlto
Linux@programming.dev•Lets Encrypt Ending TLS Client Authentication Certificate Support in 2026
2·9 months agoYes, that’s the same thing. Removing it from one place, and just adding it to another.
Adding it where?
drspod@lemmy.mlto
Linux@programming.dev•Lets Encrypt Ending TLS Client Authentication Certificate Support in 2026
1·9 months agobut maybe I’m missing something.
Yes, FTA:
May 13, 2026: the tlsclient ACME profile will no longer be available and no further certificates with the Client Authentication EKU will be issued.
…
Once this is completed, Let’s Encrypt will switch to issuing with new intermediate Certificate Authorities which also do not contain the TLS Client Authentication EKU.
…
After this change is complete, only TLS Server Authentication will be available from Let’s Encrypt.
drspod@lemmy.mlto
Linux@programming.dev•Lets Encrypt Ending TLS Client Authentication Certificate Support in 2026
3·9 months agoWhat is the public key infrastructure for obtaining client authentication certificates that have a path of trust back to a root CA? You said separate PKI for every use case, so what is the intended PKI for this use case, if not CAs like LetsEncrypt?
drspod@lemmy.mlto
Linux@programming.dev•Lets Encrypt Ending TLS Client Authentication Certificate Support in 2026
41·9 months agoThis honestly is basic security in a number of ways. Separate PKI for every use-case is the standard.
So what is the PKI for client certificate authentication?
Naming things really is that hard?


Removed by mod