Removed by mod

China is, eh, self-defending in Xinjiang against Uyghurs? Or what’s your point?

Something like a one-party political system with dear respected leader, concentration camps, surveillance, social rating system, GFW?

Note how I don’t say anything about propaganda from every crack. That’s because western propaganda has successfully evolved in the conditions of outright censorship not being allowed. Like killing cockroaches in a building again and again you make them evolve for the poisons used in the past.

If you are going to pick the “all this is not credible” line, then don’t bother. Also credible is a synonym for “believable”, and nobody can make you believe things you don’t want to believe.

Yes, one of the reasons I do this is so that people like you would clean the air.

And after 100 years of propaganda, we actually believe there never has been a better system.

If you mean the way a medieval village or town functioned, then this comparison omits the improvements of “capitalism” over it.

Person make chair, person sell chair, person eat - that’s if they are this village’s or town’s chairmaker. If not, they are treated as if they stole from the chairmaker. Teeth kicked in, banished. Something like that. The chairmaker’s role is transferred by inheritance or by apprenticeship from one person to one other person. Like a noble’s title.

The way medical practice works in some countries with English law, I’ve heard, still reminisces that, and the results are not liked generally.

Choices and social mobility and social lifts are not present in a traditional society. That village remains in one place over many years. It may grow or shrink, but there’s simply no need to allow cook’s son to become a chairmaker, or vice versa. Or if there’s is, the whole village may assemble and talk about such a decision once in 10-20 years. If he has two sons, then one of them works for the other, can’t be cook on his own. If he wants to be his own man, he can try and find an apprenticeship, if some other master doesn’t have a son or an apprentice. In other place maybe.

In a city it was similar, except, to scale the same “natural order”, guilds existed and not small families, but guilds’ heads would make such collegial decisions. Or heads of merchant families.

What you feel as oppression now is not really worse than what a medieval man felt, living all his life the same way in the same place.

I blame Marx for this misconception, he probably tried to play the “good old times” typical German card, but his followers, as a result, often believe that industrialization somehow made free people wage slaves. No. Try living in a village, today, in a western country. And then imagine you wouldn’t work or travel elsewhere, all your life would be around that small place, with the same few people and families year after year. Social lifts and social mobility, vertical or even horizontal, were simply unimaginable in such a structure.

If only this wonderful opinion were published someplace else than blogs.gnome.org and by someone who’s not a GNOME developer who are expected to lie by now.

X11 is not glorious past, it just makes sense.

Of course, when you freeze it in a certain state, only doing bug fixes, you can’t utilize its modularity and extensibility to fix problems that can be fixed in an alternative with actual development happening. But it appears the solution of finally making a fork has been found.

I welcome anyone to find fascism, nazism, conspiracy theories (if that’s about said freeze and refusal to break backwards compatibility in some things, then, well, that’s a fact visible for anyone on the web) here.

“Concerned” Trolling about the Accessibility of the Wayland session

So for actual complaints they just say it’s trolling and put quotes. That’s not a valid response.

You all need mandatory supervised access to the Internet from now on.

Maybe snowflake GNOME devs need that? I don’t use GNOME, so - won’t really feel the loss.

These are why I use FVWM and set up everything by hand, better this than feeling helpless in a supposedly user-friendly environment.

But I think under normal usable desktops, like MATE, you can do such things easily enough.

but no one else really had the resources to maintain it

That’s what I’m saying to not be true. Right now the project is controlled by RH, and they are not interested, but also don’t leave it. Maybe if this weren’t so, we’d see changes.

Its critical infrstructure, they can’t just hand it off until they’re done with it (RH10).

Yes they can, the same way they ship kernels full of backported stuff and patches.

Xlibre is happening by one of the biggest community contributors, but honestly it’ll end up like KwinFT.

The guy is unfortunately accompanying his fork with anti-vaxxer and alt-right statements.

I think Xorg will keep existing. There are a few projects buried many times and still alive, one more.

But RH is intentionally blocking the good things that could have happened without their “leadership” and imposing opinion that it’s deprecated and on life support.

The way they promoted PulseAudio, SystemD, Gnome 3, now Wayland. All that.

Say, they do almost no development of Xorg, but they don’t surrender the control of the project to someone who’d want to. They don’t accept PR’s, sometimes with responses that the project itself is deprecated or something.

They intentionally keep control, to avoid someone picking it up.

They could mean that they were a Unix user since 1991. They could also mix up years, which would be natural. Say, with 1993 or 1994. In any case you’re the obvious RH shill here.

This is a good example of RH shilling.

Also not uncommon to see “community activists” popping up here and there, with no history at all, doing small things and then somehow participating in coordinated RH-aligned action eventually. Remember that moment Stallman was pressed into defense? Not that he’s a very nice person, but the campaign was interesting in the sense that not many normal people participated in it, mostly such activists.

Also Fedora and “well-built” - it’s glossy and smooth-looking, but not “well-built”.

Also this

from paranoid people new to the community who don’t understand how this ecosystem works.

is a marker of RH shill too. They usually start with casually stating that everyone is fine with RH and the only ones complaining are noobs, nuts and troublemakers, we don’t do that here. Except it’s not true.

Quantity of development doesn’t equal quality. I personally think if RH were to vanish overnight, Linux would be fine. Of course nobody spends additional effort on projects mostly done by RH. If there’s no RH, either the projects will be dropped for lack of necessity or there will be said effort from other sources.

Amount of contributions doesn’t equal quality, mind that. RedHat also does work to sink projects which don’t fit their strategy for Linux development, and I want to ask by what right they even have such a strategy and try to impose it upon others.