

I’m talking about quantity not the popularity of a given language. There are certainly a number of popular languages that follow that convention
I’m talking about quantity not the popularity of a given language. There are certainly a number of popular languages that follow that convention
oh for sure, but I think that’s the rarer case for language implementions. Having a consistent structure with alternative keywords in static positions is just easier to develop an AST for. Personally my favorite language doesn’t even allow for const values (except by convention) so it’s really just a matter of preference
Because sometimes that let
can be replaced by other things like const
. Which can be managed statically by the machine and not by my (imperfect) ability to know if it’s mutated or not
I’m all for communication forms evolving over time but this is basically just a fully reductionist version of a meme. You could literally have any two people in the picture and keep your usage
Well yeah ofc they are. They make the seats too small so you pay for the premium. They make the food too shitty so you pay for the premium. They add too many stops to the flight so you pay for the premium. They make the carry-on requirements too small so you pay for the premium. And on and on and on
It’s all about profit. Any system focused on profit will eventually (and always) remove any and all human elements as allowed for the sake of that profit
I wish bats weren’t trying to kill us with disease all the time. They’re so damn cute!
Honestly coding communities just accept what the music scene did ages ago: no idea lives in a vacuum
lgtm