Yeah, that’s like… 250 billion tons of rice. That’s over 30 tons of rice per person in this world. Not sure this much rice even exists on this planet.
unknownuserunknownlocation
- 0 Posts
- 10 Comments
unknownuserunknownlocation@kbin.earthto
linuxmemes@lemmy.world•The Universal Operating System
9·10 days agoIIRC Debian supports RISC V
Ah, right - no problem. The IIRC was there for a reason.
unknownuserunknownlocation@kbin.earthto
linuxmemes@lemmy.world•Cherishing all nuggets of knowledge.
3·23 days agoMind you, the registry is also just a couple of files that are shown to the user as “the registry”. IIRC, on Windows, go into the user account’s root folder, and you’ll have NTUSER.dat. That’s the HKCU hive for that user.
Yes and know, 10 started with telemetry that was just about impossible to disable right out of the gate.
Windows 7 came out in 2007, if I remember correctly. That was a time when it wasn’t that uncommon to have a computer without an internet connection. Telemetry also wasn’t really a thing, either - when you had crashes or usage data the OS thought might be useful to Microsoft, the OS actually asked you, and understood that no means no. Honestly, those were better times in that regard…
Well, I’m pretty sure that shit doesn’t just work anymore.
unknownuserunknownlocation@kbin.earthto
Linux@programming.dev•Linux is about to lose a feature [Bcachefs (ofc)]– over a personality clash
01·6 months agoI mean, we could say the same thing about Kent - when he’s getting pissy, it’s about ensuring the filesystem is bulletproof and no one loses data.
Thing is, we’re not talking about getting pissy. We’re talking about getting downright insulting and borderline abusive. Linus got suspended from his own goddamn Kernel for his behavior. Let that sink in for a moment.
And I honestly believe that’s where part of the problem comes from. Kent looks up to Linus in a way, and sees himself as entitled to mimicking Linus’s bad behavior, which turns into a clusterfuck. Linux is still a good kernel despite Linus’s behavior, and bcachefs seems to be pretty good from a technical standpoint despite Kent’s behavior (even the kernel maintainers Kent pissed off admit it). They both shouldn’t be behaving that way, period. But both are very talented from a technical standpoint, which makes policing their behavior that much harder.
Ideally, yes, someone else would take over communication with Linus, but my hope isn’t particularly high at the moment. I wish Kent would calm down (further) and play by the rules more (even though he’s far from the only one who has broken those rules), and I wish Linus would learn to take it as much as he dishes it out.
And that makes it such a shame: bcachefs would be great to have in the kernel from a technical standpoint. It’s the personal conflicts that are really messing things up at the moment.
unknownuserunknownlocation@kbin.earthto
Linux@programming.dev•Linux is about to lose a feature [Bcachefs (ofc)]– over a personality clash
01·6 months agoIt’s not quite as one sided as you put it, either. The most recent last minute feature was pushed for rc3, and wasn’t big filled. It was also a feature that enhanced stability, which is the reason Kent submitted it there. I’m not saying he’s right, but it’s important context here. And he’s far from the only one who has done this. Someone recently added new hardware support in rc7.
Also, he has improved somewhat. Arguably not as much as he should, but things aren’t as bad as they originally were.
And as to the attitude - he’s in good company, honestly. Especially in regard to Linus, them judging Kent is like a group of lepers judging a beauty contest. That’s the point this article makes very well.
None of this excuses his behaviour, but it is important to put it into context.


Yes, but that’s always the case when you’re switching architectures. The x86 binaries won’t work on ARM, either.