• 0 Posts
  • 19 Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: January 26th, 2024

help-circle

  • Honestly, this idea has me pretty mortified as well. Just seeing ”rm -rf /” as part of a string sends chills down my spine.

    Granted, any reasons or explanations to cause a string being cut short to this godforsaken form and accidentally run is extremely unlikely, but a valid theoretical possibility: I can easily imagine someone mistyping the first letter after root and, wishing to delete it, pressing Backspace while simultaneously accidentally grazing the Enter key.

    Sure, the chances of it happening are about the same as a gun user accidentally dropping their gun, clumsily catching it in the air and accidentally shooting someone right in between the eyes as a result.




  • Equally serious (and just a bit more deranged of an answer):

    Humans are not meant to do work. Physical or otherwise. This slavery thing where everyone, regardless of race, gender, orientation (and almost even age) we have going on is just degrading and nonsensical.

    Humans should live in tightly-knit families and tribes. Of course, the woman should do the simpler housework like cleaning, cooking and tidying, while the father should do the more manual stuff like fixing things, growing plants, keeping animals and hunting.

    Women should likewise be seperated from books because they are more likely ro succumb to the words of the devil. I’m sorry, but that’s just how it is. Therefore men must educate their heirs (male, of course), while the wife should teach her daughters how to domthe chores.

    If you can’t see how exposing a frail woman to the harsh reality of being the man of the house, try thinking of your own daughter.





  • the phone

    So that’s it!

    Seriously though, phones are terrible for file management. Probably because every file gets thrown… Somewhere. Most into Downloads, some into Documents, and then some apps have their own esoteric space.

    All the file management UIs are equally terrible: made to look nice, but dysfunctional.

    Nothing ever prompts you where to save your shiny new file.

    And, to be fair, screen size doesn’t help.




  • Of course I (re-checked) the criteria on my own before commenting, and it stands.

    Evidence of receipt of lesser nationally or internationally recognized prizes or awards for excellence

    There are a bunch of international prises other than the Olympics. By the way, Oscars and Pulitzers aren’t inherently international - they’re made by the american film (newspaper) industry for that same industry. Awards juries are 90+% American, as are the awardees.

    Anyway, more realistic would be to look at the International math olympiad, for example. There are about 10k contestants anually, and just under 50% recieve prizes. There are similar competitions for pretty much any school subject.

    Then there’s sport. There are a bunch of sports, with each having a multitude of international competitions. The ATP Open for tennis, the FIFA/UEFA championships, for soccer, various regates for yachting especially - you name it.

    And these are just of the top of my head, and the second level of prestige (after Nobels and Oscars). Saying there’s at least 20 international competitions per sport on average is an understatement.

    All in all, for point one, aboit 5% of the population fit the bill, even discounting stuff like the France-Germany typists’ association anual speed typing competition, which just might fit the bill as well.

    Evidence of your membership in associations in the field which demand outstanding achievement of their members

    There’s Mensa, an international association - a special achievement required to join: IQ over 130. It has 150k members.

    Similarily, there are: International Society for Philosophical Enquiry, World Federation of Neurology, European Mathematical Society - you name it.

    Evidence of published material about you in professional or major trade publications or other major media

    Not even that’s that hard. Every school shooter fits the bill.

    Evidence that you have been asked to judge the work of others, either individually or on a panel.

    Be a member of a society in (2) and you will.

    Evidence of your original scientific, scholarly, artistic, athletic, or business-related contributions of major significance to the field

    Another point for fittig the bill of (1), basically, since an award is, by definition, a recognition and evidence of achievment.

    Evidence of your authorship of scholarly articles in professional or major trade publications or other major media

    Work for a year at a university or a subset of (2), and it’ll happen.

    Evidence that your work has been displayed at artistic exhibitions or showcases

    This one’s for the more artsy types. There are literally millions of galleries and museums. Getting an exhibition also isn’t that impossible.

    Evidence of your performance of a leading or critical role in distinguished organizations

    Basically, have an important-sounding title of a (2)

    Evidence that you command a high salary or other significantly high remuneration in relation to others in the field

    So, be a CEO.

    Evidence of your commercial successes in the performing arts

    Be Taylor Swift, Rammstein, or any number of more “fringe” artists.

    <hr>

    To sum up, my point is: No, you don’t need to have an Oscar, Nobel or Olympic medal to qualify. Nor do you need to be Einstein.

    Here’s someone who fits most criteria as an example:

    Meet Andriei Ogushlow. He’s a polish CEO. He studied at and got a PhD in political science. He wrote 8 scolarly articles published in intenrational journals. In his free time he does photography, and had 15 exhibitions, of which 4 were in museums. He’s a member of Mensa and the European Accounting Association. While doing his MBA, he earned a bronze medal in the A4SIC competition.

    He’d like US citizenship to be able to make his company have a strong and stable presence in the US.

    (That’s 5 out of 10).

    He’s not Einstein. But he fits the bill more than “good enough”.




  • They don’t. Not really.

    America is nothing economically without its trading partners. And that goes for every country, not just the US.

    Accepting what the US does is a stupid idea on any country’s part because Trump’s tariffs have nothing to do with “normal trading”. If anything, they’re abnormal.

    And they should be treated as such. Laughed off. Ridiculed. And most certantly not appeased. This entire situation isn’t unlike the Hitler Sudetenland stuff.

    Whatever Mr. President says Mr. President gets. Not really a good foreign policy move. It was percisely the US who set up penalties for countries “restricting trade”. Why should other countries not hold the US to the rules?

    Both import and export tariffs are barriers to trade. Since Mr President’s childish demands are appeased, soon enough, those countries appeasing will start “reciprocal” tariffs on Mr President’s percieved enemies. Why? Because it’s Mr President’s next logical step.

    Now, short of all countries that decided on appeasig the US make a sharp U-turn, what’s done is done.

    But, should they decide on such a course of action, they’d isolate America on the world market, which would dissuade Trump from keeping his mercantilism up.

    The alternstive is isolating themselves from others, together with America.



  • Being government-run, the store will obviously have:

    • a poor selection of products leaving you with no choice
    • ugly packaging meaning only the poors will go there
    • long waiting lists for entry
    • yearly, quarterly and monthly subscriptions, all required and renewed seperately, taking hours in a queue and three trips to the social services hq each to renew
    • quotas on all items, groups of items and time limited - whenever one is passed the rest don’t matter
    • no added value like delivery or good customer service
    • no market research or innovation
    • no incentive to do better or improve service
    • an active loss of money due to bueraucratic ineficiencies

    (Likewise, also spined it (almost) as much as possible.)


  • Paid luches are nice. But if I get the choice between $10.000 yearly more or paid lunches, obviously i’d go for the cash. It’s supposed to be a bonus (i.e. free), and not a way to cut corners and undermine your employees.

    Maybe it does do the company some good in terms of retention, but counting on “I’ll save $6k if I spend $4k on lunches per person on average by cutting pay for new hires” is not a good strategy. Same for ping pong tables, horseraces, pizza parties and whatever else.