Immediate mode rendering and components seem to be why people use them. And you know what? The web should natively support those but doesn’t (well it kinda bad components, but ehhh). Otherwise I agree, the frameworks are overcomplicated.
Nat (she/they)
:3
- 0 Posts
- 6 Comments
Joined 2 years ago
Cake day: December 31st, 2023
You are not logged in. If you use a Fediverse account that is able to follow users, you can follow this user.
body { background-color: pink!important; }
Nat (she/they)@lemmy.blahaj.zoneto Programmer Humor@programming.dev•Which of these javascript expressions is false?4·2 months agoNumber = IEEE-754 double precision float, which includes NaN, so it makes sense
Nat (she/they)@lemmy.blahaj.zoneto Programmer Humor@programming.dev•Tell me the truth ...1·2 months agoCould definitely be worse for latency in particular cases, but if we imagine a write heavy workload it still might win. Writing a byte/word basically has to do the same thing: read, modify write of cache lines, it just doesn’t confuse the dependency tracking quite as much. So rather than stalling on a read, I think that would end up stalling on store buffers. Writing to bits usually means less memory, and thus less memory to read in that read-modify-write part, so it might still be faster.
Nat (she/they)@lemmy.blahaj.zoneto Programmer Humor@programming.dev•Tell me the truth ...6·2 months agoA lot of times using less memory is actually better for performance because the main bottleneck is memory bandwidth or latency.
Who says this is JS? Might be Rust.