cm0002@piefed.world to Programmer Humor@programming.devEnglish · 5 days agoWebplemmy.mlimagemessage-square235linkfedilinkarrow-up1776arrow-down1160 cross-posted to: programmerhumor@lemmy.ml
arrow-up1616arrow-down1imageWebplemmy.mlcm0002@piefed.world to Programmer Humor@programming.devEnglish · 5 days agomessage-square235linkfedilink cross-posted to: programmerhumor@lemmy.ml
minus-square𝕨𝕒𝕤𝕒𝕓𝕚@feddit.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up65arrow-down2·5 days agoQuality loss? Webp supports lossless.
minus-squarepalordrolap@fedia.iolinkfedilinkarrow-up23arrow-down1·4 days agoSo does JPEG. It doesn’t mean that people (will) use it for that.
minus-squareMower2560@reddthat.comlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·4 days agoActually? I didnt know that. Is it used often? Any downsides ?
minus-squarefilcuk@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkarrow-up7·4 days agoPractically never because it’s rubbish. The only possible use is on old precision machines that don’t support newer standards, like medical imaging.
Quality loss? Webp supports lossless.
So does JPEG. It doesn’t mean that people (will) use it for that.
Actually? I didnt know that. Is it used often? Any downsides ?
Practically never because it’s rubbish. The only possible use is on old precision machines that don’t support newer standards, like medical imaging.