The model ‘blackmailed’ the person because they provided it with a prompt asking it to pretend to blackmail them. Gee, I wonder what they expected.
Have not heard the one about cancelling active alerts, but I doubt it’s any less bullshit. Got a source about it?
Edit: Here’s a deep dive into why those claims are BS: https://www.aipanic.news/p/ai-blackmail-fact-checking-a-misleading
Can’t speak for all of them, but type I does fit
Good news, you can just buy them from China at pennies :D
I’m not sure I fully get the joke, considering the literal existence of outlets like this. Did Randall not know they exist?
A percentage increase is a relative increase. The thing you’re thinking of would be described as “percentage points”.
Yes, as I pointed out it is technically correct. Just a misleading first impression.
Sure! As is currently written, it gives the first impression (to me, at least) that the traffic share of Linux has jumped from x% to (x+22)%. Now I understand that this is subjective, but I believe that’s how many people would read it at first glance as well.
Again, there’s nothing technically inaccurate about it, but the 22% number there is imo distracting and tends to lead to misunderstandings. I would personally write it as “Pornhub sees Linux traffic share increase from 5% to 6% (22.4% increase) over 2025”
22.4% of 5% base, so in actuality a 1% increase. While the title is technically accurate, it’s very misleading.
Take a Claritin, you’ll get over it
From a set of spoons? Huh?
Think of it as a really large boulder thrown from a volcanic eruption
Well, soon-ish, anyway. Estimates I’ve seen are 2026 - 2027
I’m hanging on to my current half dead phone until the new GrapheneOS partnership materialises
Can somebody reupload the image at a non-feddit.org host? Feddit is incredibly annoying in that it geoblocks most of Asia.
And titties?
Anybody want to translate the acronyms into their alternative meanings?
Granted that you didn’t know, hence it wasn’t malicious. And in this day and age remaking memes is common and nobody blinks an eye. But no, there’s no requirement that the image contains author / copyright info / whatever. It’s legally on the person reusing it to know and abide by the rules.
Then again, I’m sure Randall would fully support what you’re doing in this image.
How can ports of a game predate the platform itself? That makes zero sense.
(/s)
That’s not clickbait, that’s you trying hard to be a pedantic ass.
Yes, I also already edited my comment with a link going into the incidents and why they’re absolute nonsense.