• chickenf622@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Glad to see there are some level heads leading this project. Also great answer to how to pronounce it, the GIF creator should’ve gone for that instead of the pun.

    • FizzyOrange@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yeah except it’s named after the play so it’s definitely pronounced God-oh. I think people just mispronounce it Go-dot if they haven’t heard of the play. Looking at you Mr Linus Tips.

      • circuitfarmer@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        From the article linked on this very post:

        Those open source values even extend to how you pronounce the engine’s name. We asked if Godot is pronounced “Go-dough,” like the play, or “Go-dot.”

        “It’s open source,” Verschelde said with a grin. “Pronounce it however you like.”

        • ɯᴉuoʇuɐ@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          “Go-dough,” like the play

          “Like the play” - but where does the stress go? On the final syllable, as in French? (The play was originally written in French.) On the first syllable, as is more usual in British pronunciation of French words? (The author was Irish and apparently this is how he pronounced it - when speaking English.)

        • FizzyOrange@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          They’re being diplomatic. From Wikipedia:

          The name “Godot” was chosen due to its relation to Samuel Beckett’s play Waiting for Godot, as it represents the never-ending wish of adding new features in the engine, which would get it closer to an exhaustive product, but never will.

          • circuitfarmer@lemmy.sdf.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            It’s clear that it’s named after the play. It’s also clear that the devs really don’t care how you say it.

            Personally, I think I’ll start doing god-ot, as in “got it”.

  • merthyr1831@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Godot went from a promising but limited engine for hobbyists to the 2nd most popular engine for solo developers in about a year. We’re even finally seeing high quality Godot 3D games releasing to Steam.

    Give it a year or two and Godot might start to make headway into the established studios, too.


    Unity’s implosion has been amazing for loads of engines. other than Godot too. Bevy is making progress, and some of the biggest indies this year are on less known engines, like Balatro’s Love engine

  • mlg@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Unity was one of the first applications that made me take a good look at FOSS in general because my experience with it was:

    “Hey let’s make a game for our final project”

    “Okay, let’s try Unity”

    Flashbanged in light mode

    Dark Mode is only available for real cash money subscription license

    “Yeah okay nvm let’s try something open source lol”

    • bbuez@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’m building something heavily reliant on the physics engine. Unity you need to be an enterprise member for the ability to override methods related to physics. Easy choice

      • TheFinn@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Is that why so many unity games have the same feel? I’ve started looking into the game engine that’s used and avoiding unity games.

    • blx@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      They really paywalled dark mode? That move alone is incredibly dumb. Surefire way to alienate potential new users before they’ve even tested anything serious.

  • lilja@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    It’s great that Godot was in a good place when Unity had its (inevitable?) implosion. Having used both engines I think they are comparable enough that Godot was a perfect fit for small indie and casual devs to move over to without having to learn a completely new workflow. If Godot hadn’t been around I don’t know where everyone would’ve migrated to.

    • mindbleach@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’d argue Unity’s implosion was wholly evitable. All they had to do was announce, going forward, there would be different licensing. Big new version six months from now? Hey guess what, we’ll do things differently from then on, so make your preparations accordingly. But no - they fucked over existing projects. They tried to retroactively interfere with the business decisions of games that were years into development.

      Oracle only gets away with that shit because they’re an eight-ton gorilla. And people still desperately look for the exits every time Larry Ellison announces a relicensing scheme based on how many computers you can think of.

  • mindbleach@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    No amount of precedent will get me to stop pronouncing it G’doh.

    This isn’t a Qt situation where the people who named it are objectively wrong about how those letters should get said. I just do not like any of the other options.