Question mark says they are updated every minute, even gives you a prompt.
Watching for several minutes, none of then was good except Kimi K2. Sure, not every time, but solid third of them was actually working, while the others scored a perfect 0.
Also, as a Kimi K2 user (because Kagi), I approve. I don’t use Kimi K2 for coding, though, because JetBrains doesn’t offer that, but I use it in Kagi Assistant.
Did it show the correct time? Did it tick correctly? From my observations, even clocks that looked okay had like wrong second speed, swapped hour and minute, or was rotated altogether.
Clock but it’s made by an LLM:
https://clocks.brianmoore.com/
What an acid trip of a site. It updated while I was scrolling and legit thought I was having a flashback.
I ran into the same thing - they seem to change (potentially to other outputs from the same model?) when you click on the Question mark and go back.
Question mark says they are updated every minute, even gives you a prompt.
Watching for several minutes, none of then was good except Kimi K2. Sure, not every time, but solid third of them was actually working, while the others scored a perfect 0.
Also, as a Kimi K2 user (because Kagi), I approve. I don’t use Kimi K2 for coding, though, because JetBrains doesn’t offer that, but I use it in Kagi Assistant.
deepseek v3.1 had an (almost) perfect clock once for me.
Did it show the correct time? Did it tick correctly? From my observations, even clocks that looked okay had like wrong second speed, swapped hour and minute, or was rotated altogether.
Yeah it was showing the correct time and right tick speed. But it was only one of the clocks on that model. The rest were wrong.
Yeah it was showing the correct time and right tick speed. But it was only one of the clocks on that model. The rest were wrong.
You know, it looks like clocks drawn by dementia patients
Lol, this both shows how bad most models are… But also how damn good the two big OSS models are, DeepSeek and Kimi.
Amazing
Oh my god. I love that so much.
Now I need to do that but randomize which one is displayed ….